H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Mariano Zabaleta vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mariano Zabaleta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 1999 Gstaad third round 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1999* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mariano Zabaleta | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1999* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariano Zabaleta | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |