H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mariano Zabaleta vs Jan Vacek H2H: 1-1
Mariano Zabaleta and Jan Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mariano Zabaleta leads 1–0 on clay, while Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mariano Zabaleta | 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jan Vacek | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2001* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan Vacek | 3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariano Zabaleta | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |