H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mariano Zabaleta vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 0-1
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1995 Prague quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1995* | Prague | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 6-2 6-1 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariano Zabaleta | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |