H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Mariano Zabaleta vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-2
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Mariano Zabaleta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mariano Zabaleta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 2000 Rome Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2000* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mariano Zabaleta | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-2 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Mariano Zabaleta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariano Zabaleta | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |