H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Andy Murray H2H: 3-12
Andy Murray holds a 12–3 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Andy Murray leads 7–3 on hard courts and 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2016 Tour Finals round-robin match 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
12
15 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2016 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-3 6-2 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-4 7-5 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2016* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Andy Murray | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2014* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-1 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2014* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 6-4 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2013* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | F | Grass | Andy Murray | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-4 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Andy Murray | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 6-0 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Andy Murray | 7-5 6-2 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2011* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Andy Murray | (w/o) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2010* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andy Murray | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jan 30, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-5 6-2 6-2 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Andy Murray | 7-5 7-6(4) 6-1 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2008* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andy Murray | 7-5 7-6(2) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Andy Murray | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 |