H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 3-2

Marin Cilic holds a 3–2 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2011 Queen's Club third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2011* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Marin Cilic #27 6-4 6-4 Arnaud Clement #146 Match data
Feb 24, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #9 6-2 6-4 Arnaud Clement #67 Match data
Feb 5, 2009* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #22 6-4 6-3 Arnaud Clement #80 Match data
Jul 1, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Arnaud Clement #145 6-3 7-5 6-2 Marin Cilic #55 Match data
Feb 1, 2007* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Carpet Arnaud Clement #38 6-4 6-1 Marin Cilic #165 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Arnaud Clement
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 — — — — — — —
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 — — — — — — —
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 — — — — — — —