H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Benoit Paire H2H: 5-2

Marin Cilic holds a 5–2 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2020 Dubai third round 2-6 7-5 7-6(1).

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
France Age 37 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2020* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Benoit Paire #21 2-6 7-5 7-6(1) Marin Cilic #36 Match data
Jan 24, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marin Cilic #39 6-2 6-7(6) 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) Benoit Paire #21 Match data
May 18, 2018* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Marin Cilic #5 6-3 6-4 Benoit Paire #52 Match data
Feb 16, 2017* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #7 5-7 6-3 6-2 Benoit Paire #42 Match data
Oct 6, 2016* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #11 6-0 4-6 6-3 Benoit Paire #37 Match data
Feb 20, 2016* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Marin Cilic #12 6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 Benoit Paire #22 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Chennai ATP 250 QF Hard Benoit Paire #47 6-4 1-6 7-5 Marin Cilic #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Benoit Paire #862 #18 1,805 1,951 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Benoit Paire
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2010 1–4 20.0% #152 1,587 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2011 5–10 33.3% #95 1,603 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2012 26–26 50.0% #47 1,781 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2013 32–30 51.6% #26 1,785 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2014 10–19 34.5% #118 1,720 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2015 25–17 59.5% #19 1,922 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2016 22–31 41.5% #47 1,715 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2017 31–31 50.0% #41 1,785 0 1
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2018 26–28 48.1% #52 1,812 0 1
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2019 34–28 54.8% #24 1,817 0 3
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2020 8–12 40.0% #28 1,708 0 3
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2021 13–28 31.7% #46 1,658 0 3
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2022 4–22 15.4% #179 1,594 0 3
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2023 0–4 0.0% #117 1,585 0 3
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2024 2–3 40.0% #415 1,508 0 3
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21