H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs David Ferrer H2H: 2-4

David Ferrer holds a 4–2 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2016 Geneva semifinal 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
David Ferrer
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 20, 2016* Geneva ATP 250 SF Clay Marin Cilic #11 7-5 7-5 David Ferrer #12 Match data
Jun 2, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay David Ferrer #8 6-2 6-2 6-4 Marin Cilic #70 Match data
May 14, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay David Ferrer #12 6-3 6-2 Marin Cilic #11 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #19 7-6(4) 6-2 Marin Cilic #15 Match data
Mar 30, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Ferrer #12 3-6 6-3 6-4 Marin Cilic #18 Match data
Jan 25, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marin Cilic #20 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4 David Ferrer #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
David Ferrer #224 #3 7,220 2,270 700 368 65.5% 0 1 0 7 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic David Ferrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2002 10–6 62.5% #59 1,610 0 1
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2003 20–27 42.6% #71 1,672 0 1
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2004 29–31 48.3% #49 1,651 0 1
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2005 41–28 59.4% #14 1,776 0 1
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2006 37–24 60.7% #14 1,815 0 2
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2007 57–22 72.2% #5 2,036 0 5
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2008 40–20 66.7% #12 1,856 0 7
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2009 40–24 62.5% #17 1,853 0 7
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2010 58–23 71.6% #7 2,033 0 9
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2011 55–19 74.3% #5 2,108 0 11
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2012 68–14 82.9% #5 2,241 0 18
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2013 63–24 72.4% #3 2,100 0 20
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2014 55–24 69.6% #10 2,065 0 21
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2015 53–16 76.8% #7 2,126 0 26
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2016 33–22 60.0% #21 1,966 0 26
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2017 25–21 54.3% #37 1,914 0 27
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2018 8–17 32.0% #125 1,710 0 27
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2019 8–6 57.1% #224 1,804 0 27