H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Di Wu H2H: 2-0
Marin Cilic holds a 2–0 lead over Di Wu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2015 Shanghai Masters second round 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Di Wu | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2011* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-2 6-0 | Di Wu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marin Cilic | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |