H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 4-1

Marin Cilic holds a 4–1 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2021 Queen's Club fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2021* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Marin Cilic #37 6-3 7-6(4) Fabio Fognini #29 Match data
Jun 5, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Marin Cilic #4 6-4 6-1 3-6 6-7(4) 6-3 Fabio Fognini #18 Match data
Oct 7, 2011* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #25 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 Fabio Fognini #39 Match data
Jul 30, 2011* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Marin Cilic #31 6-2 6-2 Fabio Fognini #38 Match data
Apr 15, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fabio Fognini #108 6-2 6-0 Marin Cilic #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9