H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 5-3

Marin Cilic holds a 5–3 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on clay, while Marin Cilic leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2017 Queen's Club final 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(8).

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2017* Queen's Club ATP 250 F Grass Feliciano Lopez #32 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(8) Marin Cilic #7 Match data
Jun 3, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Marin Cilic #70 6-1 6-3 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #36 Match data
Jun 16, 2016* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Marin Cilic #13 4-6 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #21 Match data
Aug 12, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marin Cilic #19 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #16 Match data
Jun 14, 2013* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Marin Cilic #12 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 Feliciano Lopez #39 Match data
Apr 28, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #35 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Marin Cilic #11 Match data
Oct 31, 2009* Vienna ATP 500 QF Hard Marin Cilic #13 6-1 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #45 Match data
Jul 15, 2006* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Feliciano Lopez #68 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 Marin Cilic #316 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7