H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-3

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 3–1 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2015 Shenzhen semifinal 1-6 7-5 6-3.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2015* Shenzhen ATP 250 SF Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #29 1-6 7-5 6-3 Marin Cilic #14 Match data
May 12, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #28 6-4 6-3 Marin Cilic #10 Match data
Mar 14, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #49 7-6(1) 6-0 Marin Cilic #9 Match data
Feb 28, 2008* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #45 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21