H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 4-3
Marin Cilic holds a 4–3 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2019 Moscow fourth round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
3
7 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-1 7-6(5) | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2017* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Ivo Karlovic | 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(2) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2016* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-6(7) 6-2 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ivo Karlovic | 6-4 7-6(3) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ivo Karlovic | 7-5 2-6 7-6(2) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| May 10, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marin Cilic | 6-4 1-0 (ret.) | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2010* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Ivo Karlovic | #1,066 | #14 | 2,295 | 1,998 | 357 | 333 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Ivo Karlovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #73 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2004 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2005 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2006 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2007 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #26 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #73 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #56 | 1,819 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #100 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | 2013 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2014 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | 2015 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | 2016 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #20 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #95 | 1,668 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,623 | 0 | 8 |