H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 8-2
Marin Cilic holds a 8–2 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 6–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2017 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
8
–
2
10 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Marin Cilic | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2016* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Marin Cilic | 6-4 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2012* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-2 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2011* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 7-6(4) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2010* | Washington | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2010* | Chennai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-1 6-3 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2009* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2009* | Chennai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |