H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 6-2

Marin Cilic holds a 6–2 lead over Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2022 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-2.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2022* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marin Cilic #22 6-2 6-2 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #254 Match data
Feb 18, 2017* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #14 7-6(8) 7-6(5) Marin Cilic #7 Match data
Sep 10, 2015* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Marin Cilic #9 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #18 Match data
Apr 17, 2015* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Marin Cilic #10 6-3 7-6(5) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #14 Match data
Feb 14, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #37 6-4 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 Match data
Mar 27, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #11 7-5 7-6(4) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 Match data
Aug 16, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 6-3 6-4 Marin Cilic #26 Match data
Jun 15, 2007* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Marin Cilic #110 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18