H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Joao Menezes H2H: 1-0
Marin Cilic holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Menezes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marin Cilic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(7) | Joao Menezes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #86 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,199 | 577 | 348 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Joao Menezes | #1,471 | #172 | 357 | 1,522 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Joao Menezes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #15 | 2,004 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,130 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,064 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,135 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,054 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,841 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #30 | 1,928 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,952 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,932 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,826 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,824 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #86 | 1,759 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |