H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Juan Monaco H2H: 2-2

Marin Cilic and Juan Monaco are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2016 Japan Open quarterfinal 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marin Cilic #11 7-5 6-1 Juan Monaco #89 Match data Oct 8, 2016* QF Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Juan Monaco #48 6-4 6-4 Marin Cilic #10 Match data Mar 15, 2015* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Juan Monaco #58 6-4 6-4 Marin Cilic #15 Match data May 1, 2009* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Marin Cilic #33 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Juan Monaco #31 Match data Aug 12, 2008* R64 Beijing Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marin Cilic #81 #3 5,155 2,199 578 350 62.3% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 37–24 60.7% #23 1,908 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,991 0 3 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,856 0 5 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,966 0 6 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0
23 2012 38–18 67.9% #15 2,004 0 8 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 2,005 0 9 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,130 1 13 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,064 1 14 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3
27 2016 44–21 67.7% #6 2,135 1 16 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,053 1 18 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,912 1 18 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,841 1 18 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8
32 2021 32–19 62.7% #30 1,928 1 20 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,953 1 20 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,933 1 20 — — — — — — —
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,827 1 21 — — — — — — —
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,825 1 21 — — — — — — —
37 2026 14–16 46.7% #81 1,748 1 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marin Cilic Juan Monaco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2010 28 14 42 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2011 25 14 39 64.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 14 10 24 58.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 14 6 20 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 37 13 50 74.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2015 21 10 31 67.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2016 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2017 19 15 34 55.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
31 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2021 18 12 30 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 9 8 17 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 362 218 580 62.4% 128 91 219 58.4% 84 37 121 69.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/929 of Marin Cilic's and 578/587 of Juan Monaco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marin Cilic Juan Monaco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2005 1/1 2.0 2.0 50.8% 56.3% 45.2% 20.0% 50.0% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 14/14 5.4 3.5 54.6% 69.3% 48.4% 59.9% 29.1% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 24/24 7.0 3.5 52.6% 74.3% 48.5% 57.9% 51.0% 62.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 59/61 9.3 3.3 53.6% 75.6% 53.2% 60.5% 38.4% 65.3% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 65/65 7.8 2.7 56.6% 75.5% 53.6% 61.0% 38.2% 66.3% 40.0% 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8%
21 2010 59/59 7.2 2.5 58.1% 74.6% 53.5% 66.4% 43.0% 65.7% 38.0% 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4%
22 2011 62/63 7.0 2.6 54.7% 76.4% 54.7% 59.1% 44.6% 66.8% 38.3% 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3%
23 2012 54/56 6.2 2.7 55.5% 72.4% 53.2% 53.2% 46.7% 64.0% 40.4% 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1%
24 2013 36/37 8.4 2.4 56.4% 76.9% 57.0% 62.5% 43.3% 68.1% 38.6% 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8%
25 2014 71/72 10.4 2.8 56.9% 79.0% 50.9% 67.0% 39.5% 66.9% 38.0% 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9%
26 2015 54/54 12.0 2.6 58.8% 77.6% 52.0% 63.8% 41.8% 67.0% 36.8% 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7%
27 2016 62/65 10.4 2.4 55.4% 80.1% 54.7% 59.5% 40.4% 68.9% 37.1% 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7%
28 2017 64/65 11.3 3.1 58.5% 79.9% 54.9% 60.5% 42.7% 69.6% 39.7% 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2%
29 2018 58/59 10.2 3.1 58.8% 80.1% 55.1% 57.3% 40.3% 69.9% 38.1% 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4%
30 2019 41/42 9.7 5.0 58.3% 77.4% 47.7% 61.0% 41.9% 65.1% 35.0% 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1%
31 2020 21/22 10.0 3.8 59.8% 76.2% 50.1% 61.4% 33.4% 65.6% 35.7% 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9%
32 2021 49/51 11.1 3.9 58.2% 79.0% 49.9% 62.9% 38.5% 66.6% 37.0% 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7%
33 2022 51/52 11.5 3.4 59.9% 78.9% 52.2% 61.1% 41.2% 68.0% 38.0% 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6%
34 2023 2/3 9.5 3.0 65.4% 71.9% 42.9% 64.6% 21.4% 62.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 14/14 12.1 4.0 56.2% 77.9% 50.3% 59.7% 54.3% 65.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 19/19 8.7 2.8 57.0% 75.5% 50.9% 55.9% 35.8% 64.8% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 29/31 9.1 3.2 58.6% 76.8% 48.4% 61.5% 37.2% 65.2% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 909/929 9.3 3.0 57.0% 77.1% 52.6% 60.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.6% — 578/587 2.2 1.9 67.3% 65.9% 52.8% 54.1% 45.8% 61.5% 41.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marin Cilic Juan Monaco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1486 99.9 -3.62 -1.03 0.677 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1498 111.3 -1.65 -2.46 0.850 47.4% -25 +64 — 37.1% -0.77 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1715 126.8 -0.80 -0.10 0.954 49.3% -39 -98 -126 47.5% -0.11 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1908 151.0 +2.06 +1.34 1.082 51.4% -11 -243 -142 57.3% +0.46 10–8 (56%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 1992 159.4 +3.31 +2.77 1.188 52.7% +28 -214 -200 64.9% +1.04 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +2.37 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.82
21 2010 1857 158.2 +2.35 +1.40 1.109 51.8% +72 +14 -102 58.6% +0.73 13–5 (72%) 11–19 (37%) — +1.24 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.19
22 2011 1966 162.8 +4.08 +1.86 1.156 52.2% +25 -52 -198 59.6% +0.62 12–7 (63%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.09 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.40
23 2012 2005 160.0 +1.42 +3.57 1.123 52.2% -30 +11 -22 62.0% +0.74 8–3 (73%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.95 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.58
24 2013 2005 157.1 +3.69 +2.41 1.208 52.9% +18 -88 +81 63.4% +0.90 8–5 (62%) 11–4 (73%) — +0.69 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.07
25 2014 2130 169.3 +3.49 +2.72 1.150 52.3% +34 -173 -10 65.8% +0.76 13–9 (59%) 20–9 (69%) — -2.53 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.94
26 2015 2064 160.5 +3.04 +1.34 1.114 51.7% +53 -93 +78 60.4% +0.54 12–8 (60%) 26–9 (74%) — +1.96 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) — +2.65
27 2016 2136 171.9 +5.19 +1.67 1.193 52.6% +11 -180 +58 63.1% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.16 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.04
28 2017 2055 166.2 +4.81 +4.38 1.303 53.9% -89 -3 +181 63.1% +0.91 10–12 (45%) 16–14 (53%) — +0.86 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.18
29 2018 2054 170.8 +5.78 +3.23 1.264 53.3% -14 +7 +214 64.3% +0.99 9–10 (47%) 20–18 (53%) — -0.29 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) — +2.05
30 2019 1912 154.6 +1.14 -0.18 1.003 50.4% +27 +85 +277 54.5% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.07 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.07
31 2020 1842 146.2 +1.45 -0.54 1.037 50.2% +6 +126 — 45.5% -0.05 7–4 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.50 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) — -0.21
32 2021 1929 146.3 +3.33 +0.85 1.108 51.7% -35 +4 +247 57.9% +0.43 13–8 (62%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.01 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.33
33 2022 1953 160.1 +4.07 +1.98 1.190 52.7% -43 +52 +215 60.6% +0.86 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.30 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
34 2023 1933 104.1 +0.22 +0.03 0.907 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1827 133.0 +0.92 -0.98 0.975 50.1% -8 — — 45.7% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1825 142.2 +1.69 -2.10 0.870 48.1% +3 — +327 43.1% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1748 138.1 +0.73 +0.14 1.005 50.1% +67 0 +279 48.6% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2200 164.7 +3.06 +1.77 1.127 51.9% +6 -47 +77 59.1% +0.60 170–127 (57%) 230–214 (52%) 99.2 +0.53 — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.