H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 5-5

Marin Cilic and Mikhail Youzhny are tied 5–5 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2016 Basel third round 6-4 6-2.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 5
10 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 27, 2016* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #12 6-4 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #51 Match data
Feb 9, 2013* Zagreb ATP 250 SF Hard Marin Cilic #12 4-6 6-4 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #32 Match data
May 5, 2012* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Marin Cilic #24 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #36 Match data
Oct 29, 2011* St. Petersburg ATP 250 SF Hard Marin Cilic #22 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #33 Match data
Jul 23, 2011* Hamburg ATP 500 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #17 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) Marin Cilic #32 Match data
Feb 19, 2011* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Marin Cilic #28 6-2 1-6 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #11 Match data
May 9, 2010* Munich ATP 250 F Clay Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-3 4-6 6-4 Marin Cilic #11 Match data
Aug 12, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #65 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 Marin Cilic #15 Match data
Feb 14, 2008* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #8 6-4 7-6(3) Marin Cilic #39 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Chennai ATP 250 SF Hard Mikhail Youzhny #19 6-2 6-3 Marin Cilic #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21