H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 3-2

Marin Cilic holds a 3–2 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2011 Munich quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 2011* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #40 7-5 6-3 Marin Cilic #21 Match data
Oct 8, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 7-5 7-5 Marin Cilic #14 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Marin Cilic #15 6-4 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #8 Match data
Oct 26, 2007* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Carpet Marin Cilic #102 1-6 7-5 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Sep 14, 2007* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #117 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21