H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 4-8
Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 8–4 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 6–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2021 US Open first round 6-7(4) 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
8
12 main draw meetings
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-7(4) 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2018* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 6-4 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-4 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marin Cilic | 6-4 6-2 6-3 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2016* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| May 6, 2012* | Munich | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2010* | Metz | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-4 6-1 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2009* | Vienna | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-4 7-6(4) | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| May 13, 2009* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| May 8, 2009* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marin Cilic | 6-0 6-4 | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2008* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2007* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Philipp Kohlschreiber | 7-6(8) 1-6 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | #779 | #16 | 2,160 | 2,054 | 444 | 372 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Philipp Kohlschreiber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #86 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #62 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #28 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2009 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #27 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2010 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #34 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2011 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2013 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #22 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | 2014 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #24 | 1,899 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2015 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #34 | 1,972 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2017 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #29 | 1,957 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | 2018 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,886 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2019 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #114 | 1,717 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #416 | 1,662 | 0 | 7 |