H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–1 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2016 Stuttgart fourth round 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 2016* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Grass Radek Stepanek #129 7-6(4) 7-5 Marin Cilic #13 Match data
Nov 7, 2009* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Radek Stepanek #14 4-6 6-3 6-3 Marin Cilic #13 Match data
May 31, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Marin Cilic #13 6-1 7-6(4) 6-3 Radek Stepanek #19 Match data
Jul 12, 2007* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #127 7-5 6-3 Marin Cilic #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5