H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 6-2

Marin Cilic holds a 6–2 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 5–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2021 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2021* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Marin Cilic #35 6-4 3-6 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #20 Match data
Jan 26, 2020* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marin Cilic #39 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 5-7 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #9 Match data
Jan 22, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #24 6-7(6) 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-4 Marin Cilic #7 Match data
Nov 3, 2017* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #5 7-6(4) 6-2 Roberto Bautista Agut #23 Match data
Jul 11, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Marin Cilic #6 6-2 6-2 6-2 Roberto Bautista Agut #19 Match data
Jan 24, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #21 6-4 7-6(5) 7-5 Marin Cilic #13 Match data
Oct 25, 2015* Moscow ATP 250 F Hard Marin Cilic #14 6-4 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #27 Match data
Oct 19, 2014* Moscow ATP 250 F Hard Marin Cilic #8 6-4 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Roberto Bautista Agut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12