H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Robin Haase H2H: 5-0

Marin Cilic holds a 5–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2016 Marseille fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2016* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #12 4-6 6-3 7-5 Robin Haase #64 Match data
May 26, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marin Cilic #10 6-2 6-4 6-2 Robin Haase #80 Match data
Jul 29, 2011* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Marin Cilic #31 4-6 6-4 6-3 Robin Haase #52 Match data
May 27, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marin Cilic #53 7-6(6) 6-2 7-6(4) Robin Haase #58 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Chennai ATP 250 QF Hard Marin Cilic #71 4-6 6-2 6-3 Robin Haase #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 255 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Robin Haase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,778 0 1
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2012 16–25 39.0% #56 1,700 0 2
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,767 0 2
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2016 14–19 42.4% #59 1,756 0 2
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,811 0 2
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,685 0 2
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,661 0 2
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,615 0 2
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,531 0 2
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 — — — — — — —