H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marin Cilic vs Roger Federer H2H: 1-10
Roger Federer holds a 10–1 lead over Marin Cilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 6–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2021 Roland Garros second round 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Croatia
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
10
11 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jan 28, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Nov 13, 2017 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-1 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-7(4) 4-6 6-3 7-6(9) 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Marin Cilic | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-6(5) 6-7(3) 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-3 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2008* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-3 6-4 | Marin Cilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marin Cilic | #88 | #3 | 5,155 | 2,195 | 572 | 344 | 62.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 21 |
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marin Cilic | Roger Federer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 45–20 | 69.2% | #14 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,854 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 |
| 22 | 2011 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 |
| 23 | 2012 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #15 | 2,009 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 |
| 24 | 2013 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #37 | 1,964 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 |
| 25 | 2014 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #9 | 2,127 | 1 | 13 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 |
| 26 | 2015 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 2,061 | 1 | 14 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 |
| 27 | 2016 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #6 | 2,133 | 1 | 16 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 |
| 28 | 2017 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 2,055 | 1 | 17 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 |
| 29 | 2018 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #7 | 2,056 | 1 | 18 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 |
| 30 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,911 | 1 | 18 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 |
| 31 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,850 | 1 | 18 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 |
| 32 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #30 | 1,933 | 1 | 20 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 |
| 33 | 2022 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,958 | 1 | 20 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 |
| 34 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #672 | 1,912 | 1 | 20 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 |
| 35 | 2024 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #179 | 1,816 | 1 | 21 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 |
| 36 | 2025 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,819 | 1 | 21 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 |
| 37 | 2026 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,758 | 1 | 21 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 |