H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 7-1

Marin Cilic holds a 7–1 lead over Ryan Harrison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 5–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2018 Rome Masters third round 6-7(3) 6-1 7-6(1).

Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2018* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marin Cilic #5 6-7(3) 6-1 7-6(1) Ryan Harrison #57 Match data
Jan 21, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marin Cilic #6 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(4) Ryan Harrison #45 Match data
Oct 7, 2017* Tokyo ATP 500 QF Hard Marin Cilic #5 6-2 6-0 Ryan Harrison #52 Match data
May 17, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marin Cilic #8 6-3 6-2 Ryan Harrison #42 Match data
Mar 13, 2016* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marin Cilic #12 6-4 6-3 Ryan Harrison #168 Match data
Feb 24, 2016* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Hard Ryan Harrison #127 6-3 3-6 6-2 Marin Cilic #12 Match data
Feb 21, 2014* Delray Beach ATP 250 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #29 6-3 6-4 Ryan Harrison #115 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Marin Cilic #28 6-2 7-5 7-6(6) Ryan Harrison #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Ryan Harrison #1,551 #40 1,160 1,893 117 155 43.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Ryan Harrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #748 1,509 0 0
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2010 4–9 30.8% #173 1,620 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2011 14–19 42.4% #79 1,730 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2012 21–20 51.2% #69 1,776 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2013 11–21 34.4% #100 1,734 0 0
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2014 5–13 27.8% #191 1,731 0 0
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2015 5–8 38.5% #112 1,683 0 0
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2016 11–11 50.0% #90 1,822 0 0
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2017 20–23 46.5% #47 1,813 0 1
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2018 21–21 50.0% #62 1,780 0 1
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2019 3–7 30.0% #302 1,672 0 1
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2020 1–1 50.0% #479 1,653 0 1
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2021 0–1 0.0% #456 1,630 0 1
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21