H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 5-0

Marin Cilic holds a 5–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2016 US Open second round 6-1 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Marin Cilic #70 6-1 6-2 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #92 Match data
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Marin Cilic #13 6-2 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #94 Match data
Jan 4, 2013* Chennai ATP 250 R16 Hard Marin Cilic #15 4-6 6-2 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #103 Match data
Aug 14, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marin Cilic #15 6-3 4-6 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #102 Match data
Nov 10, 2010* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #15 6-4 4-6 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #55 Match data
May 29, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam Q3 Q Clay Marin Cilic #113 6-2 6-0 Sergiy Stakhovsky #181 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,839 145 195 42.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Marin Cilic Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,492 0 0
2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,528 0 0
2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,526 0 0
2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,614 0 1
2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,750 0 2
2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2012 13–26 33.3% #103 1,739 0 4
2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,679 0 4
2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,686 0 4
2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,649 0 4
2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4
2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 — — — — — — —
2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 — — — — — — —
2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 — — — — — — —
2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 — — — — — — —