H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-2

Marin Cilic and Tommy Haas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2014 Zagreb final 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2014* Zagreb ATP 250 F Hard Marin Cilic #37 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #12 Match data
Jul 21, 2012* Hamburg ATP 500 SF Clay Tommy Haas #48 7-6(7) 6-0 Marin Cilic #15 Match data
May 5, 2012* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Marin Cilic #24 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #134 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tommy Haas #34 7-5 7-5 1-6 6-7(3) 10-8 Marin Cilic #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 — — — — — — —
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15