H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Marin Cilic vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 4-3

Marin Cilic holds a 4–3 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2014 Moscow quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2014* Moscow ATP 250 QF Hard Marin Cilic #8 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #21 Match data
Jul 26, 2014* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Robredo #18 7-6(10) 6-3 Marin Cilic #22 Match data
Apr 25, 2014* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay Marin Cilic #27 7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Mar 11, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #26 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data
Mar 17, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #15 7-5 7-6(2) Marin Cilic #19 Match data
Jul 24, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #44 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #14 Match data
Jun 22, 2006* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Tommy Robredo #8 6-4 6-4 Marin Cilic #338 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marin Cilic Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12