H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marinko Matosevic vs Dustin Brown H2H: 1-1
Marinko Matosevic and Dustin Brown are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marinko Matosevic leads 1–0 on clay, while Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2015 Memphis third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2015* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dustin Brown | 6-4 6-4 | Marinko Matosevic | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marinko Matosevic | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-7(1) 7-5 | Dustin Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marinko Matosevic | #509 | #39 | 955 | 1,900 | 62 | 92 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #203 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #75 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #296 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |