Marinko Matosevic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kei Nishikori | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 27, 2014 | H2H |
| Sam Querrey | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 9, 2015 | H2H |
| John Isner | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 19, 2015 | H2H |
| Fernando Verdasco | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 11, 2014 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Marinko Matosevic vs Prakash Amritraj
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marinko Matosevic vs Prakash Amritraj.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prakash Amritraj | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Marinko Matosevic | Match data | Jun 22, 2010* | Q2 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marinko Matosevic | #509 | #39 | 955 | 1,881 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,583 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #203 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #296 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 46 | 63 | 109 | 42.2% | 8 | 18 | 26 | 30.8% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/155 of Marinko Matosevic's and 35/35 of Prakash Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 53.3% | 50.0% | 40.5% | 58.8% | — | 45.6% | 22.0% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7/7 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 60.7% | 67.9% | 41.3% | 50.3% | 14.5% | 57.5% | 30.9% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 62.2% | 65.7% | 49.4% | 64.7% | 47.1% | 59.6% | 35.0% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 57.6% | 65.1% | 58.8% | 61.9% | 33.3% | 62.3% | 19.8% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 56.9% | 69.6% | 57.9% | 63.8% | 43.7% | 62.8% | 33.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4/4 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 56.6% | 76.6% | 50.4% | 58.8% | 59.3% | 65.6% | 34.7% |
| 24 | 2010 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 53.6% | 59.9% | 52.7% | 36.3% | 43.6% | 56.5% | 41.4% | 2008 | 6/6 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 60.0% | 77.0% | 60.3% | 62.4% | 41.8% | 70.3% | 33.4% |
| 25 | 2011 | 11/11 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 63.3% | 44.3% | 41.1% | 36.7% | 55.7% | 34.3% | 2009 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 60.7% | 68.7% | 59.0% | 56.7% | 36.7% | 64.4% | 34.0% |
| 26 | 2012 | 35/35 | 4.4 | 2.5 | 62.5% | 66.5% | 48.9% | 59.9% | 44.6% | 59.9% | 36.3% | 2010 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 68.6% | 71.4% | 12.5% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 52.9% | 23.4% |
| 27 | 2013 | 41/42 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 58.5% | 69.3% | 48.0% | 48.8% | 42.8% | 60.7% | 39.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 44/44 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 70.8% | 48.8% | 61.9% | 39.5% | 61.9% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 19/19 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 59.0% | 64.0% | 46.4% | 45.9% | 40.1% | 56.1% | 32.2% | 2013 | 4/4 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 58.3% | 70.7% | 53.2% | 61.6% | 42.3% | 63.2% | 39.6% |
| Career | — | 154/155 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 59.6% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 53.8% | 41.5% | 59.8% | 36.8% | — | 35/35 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 59.5% | 70.2% | 51.0% | 58.0% | 35.8% | 62.4% | 32.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marinko Matosevic | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1494 | 101.3 | -1.17 | +2.03 | 0.405 | 36.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.67 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1483 | 94.8 | -2.40 | -2.14 | 0.727 | 44.7% | +24 | — | — | 21.4% | -2.21 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.24 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1461 | 97.8 | -1.33 | -2.26 | 0.865 | 47.6% | +20 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.69 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1440 | 95.5 | -1.50 | -4.04 | 0.524 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1453 | 106.5 | -0.30 | +0.31 | 0.889 | 48.8% | +5 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1474 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1499 | 109.7 | -2.19 | +1.85 | 1.009 | 49.8% | — | — | +137 | 44.4% | +0.11 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.46 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1517 | 116.7 | -2.61 | +2.14 | 0.952 | 49.3% | +46 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.60 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.32 | 2008 | 1535 | 105.8 | +1.32 | -1.65 | 1.127 | 51.2% | — | — | +160 | 60.0% | +0.53 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.17 |
| 25 | 2011 | 1652 | 121.3 | -4.18 | -1.69 | 0.774 | 45.1% | -10 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.46 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.1 | -0.34 | 2009 | 1521 | 108.7 | -0.42 | -0.71 | 0.956 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.09 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1723 | 139.2 | -2.60 | +0.07 | 0.905 | 48.6% | -9 | -96 | -35 | 41.4% | -0.34 | 10–3 (77%) | 6–8 (43%) | 106.3 | +0.84 | 2010 | 1510 | 101.8 | -1.46 | -4.81 | 0.497 | 38.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1794 | 155.0 | -1.62 | +2.21 | 0.992 | 49.7% | +50 | -182 | -171 | 45.7% | -0.30 | 3–9 (25%) | 9–7 (56%) | 99.0 | -0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 1823 | 149.0 | -1.49 | +2.27 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -14 | -180 | -83 | 49.5% | -0.28 | 4–9 (31%) | 13–8 (62%) | 97.3 | -4.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1634 | 127.1 | -5.38 | -1.86 | 0.733 | 44.4% | +99 | -49 | — | 23.9% | -1.65 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–5 (0%) | 92.6 | -0.53 | 2013 | 1570 | 113.3 | -0.40 | -2.32 | 1.075 | 51.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.31 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1620 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 1598 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 1583 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1882 | 141.4 | -2.48 | +0.96 | 0.917 | 48.5% | +19 | -146 | -100 | 41.4% | -0.57 | 20–27 (43%) | 31–32 (49%) | 97.6 | -3.66 | — | 1583 | 107.7 | -0.92 | -1.37 | 0.865 | 47.6% | +18 | — | +151 | 39.3% | -0.81 | 6–9 (40%) | 3–8 (27%) | 95.4 | +9.37 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Prakash Amritraj
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 29, 2005 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 12, 2013 | H2H |
| Flavio Cipolla | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 11, 2013 | H2H |
| Go Soeda | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 4, 2013 | H2H |
| Guillaume Rufin | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 3, 2013 | H2H |