H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Agustin Calleri H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Agustin Calleri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Agustin Calleri | #894 | #16 | 1,405 | 1,902 | 199 | 182 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Agustin Calleri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #62 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #67 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #24 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #42 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #60 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #391 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |