H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Alberto Martin H2H: 0-1
Alberto Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alberto Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2004 Adelaide third round 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alberto Martin | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |