H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Amer Delic H2H: 3-0
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over Amer Delic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2009 Brisbane third round 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BIH
Age 44
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | Amer Delic | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2007* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-4 | Amer Delic | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2004* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-1 6-3 | Amer Delic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Amer Delic | #1,041 | #60 | 728 | 1,718 | 25 | 53 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Amer Delic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #447 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #93 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #219 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |