H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 1-1
Mario Ancic and Andreas Seppi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay, while Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 6-2 7-6(1) 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2007* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 4-0 (ret.) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |