H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-4
Andy Roddick holds a 4–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2007 Australian Open fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 3-6 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2005* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Andy Roddick | 6-4 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Andy Roddick | 6-4 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Andy Roddick | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |