H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Antony Dupuis H2H: 1-2
Antony Dupuis holds a 2–1 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Antony Dupuis won the 2004 Milan final 6-4 6-7(12) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2004* | Milan | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Antony Dupuis | 6-4 6-7(12) 7-6(5) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Antony Dupuis | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2003* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Antony Dupuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |