H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Tokyo semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2005* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-2 6-1 | Bjorn Phau | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 7-5 6-2 6-1 | Bjorn Phau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bjorn Phau | #1,098 | #59 | 1,038 | 1,733 | 80 | 138 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Bjorn Phau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #323 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #148 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #158 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #136 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #77 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #183 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #102 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #371 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |