H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Milan third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-4 7-5 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |