H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Cyril Saulnier H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Cyril Saulnier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2005* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-2 6-1 | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 7-6(8) | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Cyril Saulnier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |