Mario Ancic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Ivan Ljubicic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Nikolay Davydenko | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 8, 2008 | H2H |
| Dominik Hrbaty | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 16, 2010 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Daniel Koellerer H2H: 0-1
Daniel Koellerer holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Koellerer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Koellerer won the 2010 Munich Open first round 7-6(7) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Koellerer | 7-6(7) 7-5 | Mario Ancic | Match data | May 5, 2010* | R32 | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 125 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Koellerer | #385 | #55 | 904 | 1,653 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mario Ancic | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,876 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mario Ancic | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2002 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 106 | 78 | 184 | 57.6% | 32 | 23 | 55 | 58.2% | 39 | 14 | 53 | 73.6% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | Career | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 53/53 of Daniel Koellerer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Mario Ancic | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2002 | 8/10 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.1% | 75.0% | 44.7% | 54.2% | 29.0% | 59.8% | 38.4% | 2003 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 67.9% | 58.3% | 35.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 50.9% | 33.9% |
| 2003 | 32/32 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 57.9% | 72.2% | 51.0% | 55.3% | 38.5% | 63.0% | 37.1% | 2004 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 71.5% | 61.8% | 55.8% | 55.4% | 39.9% | 60.0% | 44.5% |
| 2004 | 47/48 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 62.3% | 75.9% | 55.0% | 45.1% | 40.3% | 67.8% | 37.9% | 2005 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 74.7% | 65.9% | 55.9% | 62.0% | 32.5% | 62.8% | 36.5% |
| 2005 | 65/65 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 61.8% | 79.5% | 52.0% | 62.9% | 46.7% | 68.9% | 37.4% | 2007 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 52.0% | 68.9% | 52.1% | 16.7% | 46.8% | 60.8% | 49.5% |
| 2006 | 70/70 | 9.1 | 2.0 | 62.7% | 75.5% | 53.5% | 64.7% | 44.0% | 67.2% | 37.3% | 2008 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 70.0% | 59.2% | 54.6% | 36.7% | 39.4% | 57.0% | 35.1% |
| 2007 | 23/23 | 8.3 | 1.7 | 63.5% | 76.8% | 53.0% | 56.1% | 42.7% | 68.0% | 35.4% | 2009 | 27/27 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 69.3% | 64.3% | 49.6% | 56.9% | 46.2% | 59.8% | 35.7% |
| 2008 | 45/46 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 62.9% | 76.3% | 53.6% | 64.5% | 39.8% | 67.7% | 37.1% | 2010 | 14/14 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 65.6% | 62.1% | 42.1% | 48.7% | 50.1% | 54.4% | 33.2% |
| 2009 | 19/19 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 73.0% | 57.8% | 59.9% | 30.8% | 66.6% | 37.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 5/5 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 69.0% | 42.0% | 50.6% | 42.4% | 58.0% | 31.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mario Ancic | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1531 | 113.3 | -1.58 | +0.50 | 0.955 | 48.9% | -13 | — | +101 | 37.5% | -0.50 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.28 | 2003 | 1475 | 97.7 | -1.06 | -0.96 | 0.692 | 42.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 2003 | 1622 | 126.7 | +0.21 | +0.64 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -36 | -40 | -47 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | -0.08 | 2004 | 1521 | 101.4 | -2.70 | +2.78 | 1.113 | 51.9% | — | +33 | — | 55.6% | +0.34 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.12 |
| 2004 | 1725 | 141.5 | +4.07 | +1.16 | 1.178 | 52.4% | -136 | -28 | +99 | 54.0% | +0.48 | 6–9 (40%) | 7–17 (29%) | — | -1.51 | 2005 | 1509 | 104.8 | -1.67 | -1.99 | 0.982 | 49.7% | — | +25 | — | 37.5% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 2005 | 1799 | 152.9 | +5.24 | +0.79 | 1.202 | 53.0% | -15 | -42 | +132 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 5–11 (31%) | 18–11 (62%) | — | +2.76 | 2006 | 1514 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1954 | 149.4 | +4.79 | +0.38 | 1.138 | 52.3% | -48 | -50 | +88 | 64.1% | +0.94 | 21–2 (91%) | 19–14 (58%) | — | +1.74 | 2007 | 1541 | 111.9 | +1.61 | +0.92 | 1.265 | 55.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.18 |
| 2007 | 1882 | 144.6 | +3.39 | -0.07 | 1.107 | 51.5% | -14 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.28 | 2008 | 1526 | 112.0 | -1.73 | -1.29 | 0.817 | 45.5% | — | -17 | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.19 |
| 2008 | 1925 | 152.1 | +4.71 | +1.41 | 1.150 | 52.1% | -36 | -23 | +173 | 58.0% | +0.59 | 9–4 (69%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -4.16 | 2009 | 1616 | 130.9 | -2.40 | -1.25 | 0.889 | 47.8% | +30 | -5 | -138 | 41.3% | -0.69 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.63 |
| 2009 | 1918 | 145.3 | +2.66 | +1.24 | 1.114 | 51.2% | +12 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.45 | 6–0 (100%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.19 | 2010 | 1542 | 108.7 | -5.84 | -2.45 | 0.729 | 44.1% | +60 | +21 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.57 |
| 2010 | 1877 | 117.6 | -1.67 | -1.63 | 0.746 | 45.6% | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2019 | 150.9 | +3.80 | +0.75 | 1.125 | 51.9% | -37 | -37 | +105 | 57.8% | +0.60 | 59–40 (60%) | 72–76 (49%) | 106.1 | -0.38 | Career | 1654 | 120.2 | -3.07 | -1.30 | 0.865 | 47.2% | +43 | +6 | -138 | 40.0% | -0.80 | 10–10 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 107.0 | +2.42 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniel Koellerer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Golubev | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 8, 2010 | H2H |
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 27, 2010 | H2H |
| Steve Darcis | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 16, 2009 | H2H |
| Julien Benneteau | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Nicolas Massu | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 27, 2009 | H2H |