H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 1-2
Dmitry Tursunov holds a 2–1 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 Zagreb third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2005* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Dmitry Tursunov | 5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2004* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 6-1 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |