H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-0
Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2006 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2006* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-4 6-0 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2004* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-2 6-3 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 |