H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 2-1

Mario Ancic holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–0 on grass, while Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2009 Brisbane fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 9, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #15 6-2 6-3 Mario Ancic #35 Match data
Jul 1, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mario Ancic #43 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 13-11 Fernando Verdasco #18 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Mario Ancic #44 7-6(6) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7