H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Franco Squillari H2H: 0-1
Franco Squillari holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Franco Squillari leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Franco Squillari won the 2003 Miami Masters first round 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2003* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Franco Squillari | 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Franco Squillari | #1,542 | #11 | 1,670 | 1,846 | 146 | 159 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Franco Squillari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #328 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #52 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #55 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #143 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |