H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 0-1
Greg Rusedski holds a 1–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2005 Canada Masters fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Greg Rusedski | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Greg Rusedski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 |