H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 0-3
Guillermo Coria holds a 3–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Coria leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guillermo Coria won the 2005 Hamburg Masters fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2005* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-4 6-3 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2004* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Guillermo Coria | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| May 30, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 6-3 6-1 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Guillermo Coria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 |