H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Mario Ancic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-0

Mario Ancic holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Australian Open second round 3-6 7-5 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mario Ancic
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Ancic #10 3-6 7-5 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #65 Match data Jan 18, 2007* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mario Ancic #13 3-6 6-4 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #105 Match data May 18, 2006* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 125 60.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mario Ancic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 26–22 54.2% #29 1,725 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,799 0 1 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,881 0 3 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0
24 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,925 0 3 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0
25 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,917 0 3 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0
26 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,876 0 3 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mario Ancic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 24 11 35 68.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2008 15 9 24 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2009 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 78 184 57.6% 32 23 55 58.2% 39 14 53 73.6% 16 10 26 61.5% — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 314/318 of Mario Ancic's and 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mario Ancic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 8/10 7.0 6.0 49.1% 75.0% 44.7% 54.2% 29.0% 59.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 32/32 8.4 4.3 57.9% 72.2% 51.0% 55.3% 38.5% 63.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 47/48 9.5 3.2 62.3% 75.9% 55.0% 45.1% 40.3% 67.8% 37.9% 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3%
21 2005 65/65 11.3 2.8 61.8% 79.5% 52.0% 62.9% 46.7% 68.9% 37.4% 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2%
22 2006 70/70 9.1 2.0 62.7% 75.5% 53.5% 64.7% 44.0% 67.2% 37.3% 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1%
23 2007 23/23 8.3 1.7 63.5% 76.8% 53.0% 56.1% 42.7% 68.0% 35.4% 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7%
24 2008 45/46 9.2 2.3 62.9% 76.3% 53.6% 64.5% 39.8% 67.7% 37.1% 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9%
25 2009 19/19 7.6 1.3 60.0% 73.0% 57.8% 59.9% 30.8% 66.6% 37.2% 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9%
26 2010 5/5 8.0 2.6 59.8% 69.0% 42.0% 50.6% 42.4% 58.0% 31.3% 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0%
Career — 314/318 9.3 2.7 61.5% 76.0% 53.0% 59.0% 41.5% 67.0% 37.2% — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mario Ancic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1531 113.3 -1.58 +0.50 0.955 48.9% -13 — +101 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.2 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1622 126.7 +0.21 +0.64 1.003 50.1% -36 -40 -47 46.1% -0.20 6–9 (40%) 8–12 (40%) 98.1 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1725 141.5 +4.07 +1.16 1.178 52.4% -136 -28 +99 54.0% +0.48 6–9 (40%) 7–17 (29%) 93.6 -1.51 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27
21 2005 1799 152.9 +5.24 +0.79 1.202 53.0% -15 -42 +132 64.8% +1.01 5–11 (31%) 18–11 (62%) 98.9 +2.76 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99
22 2006 1954 149.4 +4.79 +0.38 1.138 52.3% -48 -50 +88 64.1% +0.94 21–2 (91%) 19–14 (58%) 115.9 +1.74 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39
23 2007 1882 144.6 +3.39 -0.07 1.107 51.5% -14 — — 60.0% +0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.28 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42
24 2008 1925 152.1 +4.71 +1.41 1.150 52.1% -36 -23 +173 58.0% +0.59 9–4 (69%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -4.16 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03
25 2009 1918 145.3 +2.66 +1.24 1.114 51.2% +12 — — 55.3% +0.45 6–0 (100%) 4–4 (50%) 104.4 -0.19 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38
26 2010 1877 117.6 -1.67 -1.63 0.746 45.6% +37 — — 33.3% -0.83 2–0 1–1 — -0.31 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2019 150.9 +3.80 +0.75 1.125 51.9% -37 -37 +105 57.8% +0.60 59–40 (60%) 72–76 (49%) 106.1 -0.38 — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.