H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Gustavo Kuerten H2H: 1-0
Mario Ancic holds a 1–0 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2005 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2005* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 7-5 6-2 | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Gustavo Kuerten | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 |