H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs Igor Andreev H2H: 1-1
Mario Ancic and Igor Andreev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on grass, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2004 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2004* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-1 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2004* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |