H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mario Ancic vs James Blake H2H: 3-0
Mario Ancic holds a 3–0 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2007 Madrid Masters third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2007* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mario Ancic | 6-3 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
| May 20, 2006* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Mario Ancic | 4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | James Blake | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2005* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mario Ancic | 6-2 7-6(5) | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mario Ancic | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |